header-logo header-logo

08 October 2020 / Caroline Shea KC , Gavin Bennison
Issue: 7905 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Adverse possession: Boundary matters

28862
‘Reasonable belief as to boundary?’: Caroline Shea QC & Gavin Bennison report on adverse possession under the Land Registration Act 2002

In brief

  • The facts of Dowse v Bradford.
  • Paragraph 5(4): the boundary condition.
  • Reflection and implications.

Most property lawyers will know that the law of adverse possession of registered land changed fundamentally, albeit prospectively, when Sch 6 to the Land Registration Act 2002 (the Act) came into force on 13 October 2003. As explained by Mr Justice Fancourt in Dowse v City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council [2020] UKUT 0202 (LC), [2020] All ER (D) 112 (Jul) at [10], the Act:

‘replaced the partly common law and partly statutory regime for adverse possession in the case of registered land and introduced a new statutory regime, based on the common law concept of adverse possession of land. In the context of registered land, the change… is contained within Schedule 6 to the Act.’

One of the challenges of practice in this area is that one

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll