header-logo header-logo

08 October 2020 / Caroline Shea KC , Gavin Bennison
Issue: 7905 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Adverse possession: Boundary matters

28862
‘Reasonable belief as to boundary?’: Caroline Shea QC & Gavin Bennison report on adverse possession under the Land Registration Act 2002

In brief

  • The facts of Dowse v Bradford.
  • Paragraph 5(4): the boundary condition.
  • Reflection and implications.

Most property lawyers will know that the law of adverse possession of registered land changed fundamentally, albeit prospectively, when Sch 6 to the Land Registration Act 2002 (the Act) came into force on 13 October 2003. As explained by Mr Justice Fancourt in Dowse v City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council [2020] UKUT 0202 (LC), [2020] All ER (D) 112 (Jul) at [10], the Act:

‘replaced the partly common law and partly statutory regime for adverse possession in the case of registered land and introduced a new statutory regime, based on the common law concept of adverse possession of land. In the context of registered land, the change… is contained within Schedule 6 to the Act.’

One of the challenges of practice in this area is that one

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll