header-logo header-logo

01 April 2022 / Jamie Sutherland , Imogen Dodds
Issue: 7973 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Adverse Possession: The General Theory of Relativity (of title)

77181
Jamie Sutherland & Imogen Dodds discuss the recent case of White and another v Amirtharaja and another
  • New adverse possession decision from the Court of Appeal demonstrates importance of relativity of title.
  • The High Court had been wrong to permit the respondent owners to assert on appeal that they had inherited ‘paper title’ to the disputed passageway from their predecessors.
  • However, prior possession without paper title would give an owner superior title to a squatter, unless and until the statutory period and conditions to acquire title by adverse possession had been met.

As is often the way, White and another v Amirtharaja and another [2022] EWCA Civ 11, All ER (D) 35 (Jan) concerned a small area of land, but raised interesting questions of fact and law. In 2017, the Whites purchased Hollis House, and were registered as freehold proprietors. In the proceedings, they claimed title to a narrow passageway leading from the rear garden of Hollis House to an access road, relying on alleged adverse possession

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll