header-logo header-logo

After the party

30 October 2008 / Paul Beevers
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

How does the law help borrowers locked into uncompetitive deals? Paul Beevers reports

When a fixed rate mortgage ends, the interest rate usually defaults to the lender’s standard variable rate, which may or may not be higher than the average market rate. For some borrowers their lender’s standard rate may come as nasty shock, especially if they enjoyed a low introductory rate. Standard variable mortgage rates have not been particularly competitive in the past, and borrowers have relied on their ability to find a new deal with another lender to avoid paying over the odds for their loan once their fixed rate ended. Some borrowers will now find that they cannot refinance and lenders may take advantage of this to increase their margins on “captive” loans. Is there anything a borrower can do?

It may come as a surprise to learn that the courts have already been asked to decide the arguments that arise when borrowers say that they are being treated unfairly, and that the facts giving rise to the Paragon cases discussed below are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll