header-logo header-logo

30 October 2008 / Paul Beevers
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

After the party

How does the law help borrowers locked into uncompetitive deals? Paul Beevers reports

When a fixed rate mortgage ends, the interest rate usually defaults to the lender’s standard variable rate, which may or may not be higher than the average market rate. For some borrowers their lender’s standard rate may come as nasty shock, especially if they enjoyed a low introductory rate. Standard variable mortgage rates have not been particularly competitive in the past, and borrowers have relied on their ability to find a new deal with another lender to avoid paying over the odds for their loan once their fixed rate ended. Some borrowers will now find that they cannot refinance and lenders may take advantage of this to increase their margins on “captive” loans. Is there anything a borrower can do?

It may come as a surprise to learn that the courts have already been asked to decide the arguments that arise when borrowers say that they are being treated unfairly, and that the facts giving rise to the Paragon cases discussed below are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll