header-logo header-logo

After the party

30 October 2008 / Paul Beevers
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

How does the law help borrowers locked into uncompetitive deals? Paul Beevers reports

When a fixed rate mortgage ends, the interest rate usually defaults to the lender’s standard variable rate, which may or may not be higher than the average market rate. For some borrowers their lender’s standard rate may come as nasty shock, especially if they enjoyed a low introductory rate. Standard variable mortgage rates have not been particularly competitive in the past, and borrowers have relied on their ability to find a new deal with another lender to avoid paying over the odds for their loan once their fixed rate ended. Some borrowers will now find that they cannot refinance and lenders may take advantage of this to increase their margins on “captive” loans. Is there anything a borrower can do?

It may come as a surprise to learn that the courts have already been asked to decide the arguments that arise when borrowers say that they are being treated unfairly, and that the facts giving rise to the Paragon cases discussed below are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll