header-logo header-logo

30 October 2008 / Paul Beevers
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

After the party

How does the law help borrowers locked into uncompetitive deals? Paul Beevers reports

When a fixed rate mortgage ends, the interest rate usually defaults to the lender’s standard variable rate, which may or may not be higher than the average market rate. For some borrowers their lender’s standard rate may come as nasty shock, especially if they enjoyed a low introductory rate. Standard variable mortgage rates have not been particularly competitive in the past, and borrowers have relied on their ability to find a new deal with another lender to avoid paying over the odds for their loan once their fixed rate ended. Some borrowers will now find that they cannot refinance and lenders may take advantage of this to increase their margins on “captive” loans. Is there anything a borrower can do?

It may come as a surprise to learn that the courts have already been asked to decide the arguments that arise when borrowers say that they are being treated unfairly, and that the facts giving rise to the Paragon cases discussed below are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll