header-logo header-logo

Age of prohibition

03 June 2010 / Malcolm Dowden , Saira Malik
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Competition law prohibition is to extend to land agreements, says Malcolm Dowden & Saira Malik

The Land Agreements Exclusion and Revocation Order 2004, which excluded land agreements from the operation of the Competition Act 1998, has been revoked subject to a transitional period up to 6 April 2011 to allow businesses to review their land agreements for compliance with competition laws.

The exclusion for land agreements.

The 1998 Act prohibits:
 

  • anti-competitive agreements (Ch 1); and
  • abuse of a dominant market position (Ch 2).

Agreements were excluded from the Ch 1 prohibition to the extent that they create, alter, transfer or terminate an interest in land on the grounds that they were unlikely to have an adverse effect on competition.

However, the Competition Commission’s April 2008 report on grocery retailing concluded that exclusivity arrangements and restrictive covenants (especially by the major grocery retailers) can create:

  • challenges for new entrants; and
  • difficulties for existing competitors intending to expand.

It concluded that the exclusion for land agreements entered into by those major grocery

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll