header-logo header-logo

03 June 2010 / Malcolm Dowden , Saira Malik
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Age of prohibition

Competition law prohibition is to extend to land agreements, says Malcolm Dowden & Saira Malik

The Land Agreements Exclusion and Revocation Order 2004, which excluded land agreements from the operation of the Competition Act 1998, has been revoked subject to a transitional period up to 6 April 2011 to allow businesses to review their land agreements for compliance with competition laws.

The exclusion for land agreements.

The 1998 Act prohibits:
 

  • anti-competitive agreements (Ch 1); and
  • abuse of a dominant market position (Ch 2).

Agreements were excluded from the Ch 1 prohibition to the extent that they create, alter, transfer or terminate an interest in land on the grounds that they were unlikely to have an adverse effect on competition.

However, the Competition Commission’s April 2008 report on grocery retailing concluded that exclusivity arrangements and restrictive covenants (especially by the major grocery retailers) can create:

  • challenges for new entrants; and
  • difficulties for existing competitors intending to expand.

It concluded that the exclusion for land agreements entered into by those major grocery

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll