header-logo header-logo

AI in the witness box

244923

Minesh Tanna & David Bridge set out a new framework of guidance for experts who use AI

  • The Academy of Experts has published guidance for experts, setting out various forms of AI use, categorising them by risk and setting parameters for when and how experts might safely use them while complying with their duties to the court.
  • Many expert witnesses use AI but they have until now had little by way of guidance.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is being used in a variety of ways for expert evidence, from forensic analysis and medical diagnostics to financial modelling and data analysis. Potentially, there are significant advantages—speed of drafting, accuracy of presentation and the ability to trawl large data sets—as well as risks such as bias, hallucinations and the challenge of validating complex algorithms. None of the established rules or guidance relating to expert evidence specifically addresses how experts should approach the use of AI in preparing reports for parties in disputes.

Given the high-profile issues that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll