header-logo header-logo

AI is everywhere—except in the SQE

247603
© Getty images
Artificial intelligence is now part of everyday practice of law. Should it also be recognised in how lawyers qualify? Dr Alan Ma on the importance of digital judgement
  • Contends that digital judgement is now a foundational legal skill and therefore AI-related competencies should be included in the SQE.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer experimental in legal practice. It is operational.

Junior solicitors are drafting advice with AI assistance, summarising disclosure bundles through automation, and relying on predictive research tools embedded within everyday workflow systems. In many firms, digital intermediaries now sit between lawyer and output.

Yet while AI has become ordinary in practice, it remains formally absent from the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE). This is not an argument that the SQE is flawed, nor a call for technological fashion in assessment. It is a more focused question: if newly qualified solicitors are expected to exercise professional judgement within AI-mediated environments from day one, should qualification assessment more explicitly reflect that reality?

AI

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll