header-logo header-logo

AI regulation & GDPR: ‘nerdy’ but serious problems

16 October 2024
Issue: 8090 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Artificial intelligence , Privacy
printer mail-detail

The AI Act, GDPR, AI treaty and other regulation could hinder the development of artificial intelligence (AI) and automated decision-making, Sir Geoffrey Vos, the Master of the Rolls, has warned

Giving a speech to the Irish Law Society Industry Event last week, Sir Geoffrey said that, as technology advances, it is important ‘not to impede its beneficial adoption by premature regulation, before the dangers posed by those technologies are clearly understood’.

The EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act partially came into force in August. The UK, EU, USA and others have signed the Council of Europe’s Treaty on AI, human rights, democracy and the rule of law.

Sir Geoffrey highlighted two ‘nerdy’ but ‘serious problems’—Art 22 of the GDPR, and the question of whether the owners of data used to train AI tools retain residual rights once the machine is in the public domain.

Article 22 protects the data subject’s right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling.

Sir Geoffrey said: ‘We may, I suppose, end up with a situation in which local authorities, Amazon and government pension authorities ask customers to consent to automated decision-making every time they contact you, just as we are asked 20 times a day to consent to cookies or additional cookies.’

Article 22 would also have repercussions if AI were to be used in judicial processes, he said, and ‘if AI were ever to be used in judicial decision-making, an automated decision could arguably not be effective’.

Issues over residual rights, such as licensing rights, in data used to train AI are likely to be ‘the subject of significant litigation in the future’, Sir Geoffrey predicted. He referred to a current dispute between Getty Images and Stability AI.

Sir Geoffrey said both problems were ‘created in part at least by regulation getting ahead of private law’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll