header-logo header-logo

14 June 2007 / Jean Howell
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Features , Environment , Property
printer mail-detail

Air matters

Eco-friendly townies need to ensure their wind turbines have access to an unrestricted air flow, says Jean Howell

The government has recently announced that planning permission may not always be necessary before wind turbines can be erected on urban homes, provided they have little or no impact on neighbouring properties.
Every freehold owner of land owns not only the surface of the land but the air above it “up to the sky”. Apart from any restrictions, such as aviation laws, planning restrictions or covenants against building, adjoining freeholders can build as high on their land as they wish.

This is unlikely to affect wind farms, but urban owner A intending to put a wind turbine on his house, office block or block of flats needs to ensure that his neighbour B (and also neighbours C, D and E) do not block the flow of air to the turbine. This may be done by express agreement, but is unlikely other than in return for some reciprocal advantage:
- If there is an agreement, A will want to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll