header-logo header-logo

01 August 2014 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7617 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Alarm bells

specialist_family_herring

A recent case sends a warning to any parent who suspects the other of sexual abuse, as Jonathan Herring reports

Penelope Leach’s new book, Family Breakdown, contains much which is familiar to family lawyers. She writes that family breakdown harms children and that to combat this, parents must engage in mutual parenting on separation, enabling and encouraging each other in their parental roles after divorce. Parents who fail to do this can cause their children serious harm. Had she wanted to cite a case to support her thesis, Re W (A Child) [2014] EWCA Civ 772 could have used. At one level, the decision is one where the undermining of one parent by the other was recognised as posing a serious risk of harm to the child. Yet it will be suggested here, that the case highlights another major issue facing family law.

In Re W (A Child) the mother appealed against an interim care order under the Children Act 1989, s 38(1), made in the context of a fierce dispute over

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll