header-logo header-logo

18 February 2021 / Jonathan Goodliffe
Issue: 7921 / Categories: Features , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Alcohol & insurance: The spirit of the law

39807
Jonathan Goodliffe investigates how alcohol misuse can affect insurance
  • Alcohol causes multiple problems, including legal problems, in insurance.
  • It is often relevant to what the policy does or does not cover.
  • People with alcohol problems are often very risk prone.
  • They are more likely to answer questions incorrectly when applying for insurance.
  • When they stop drinking they may have difficulty getting the insurance they need.

Life insurance and suicide

Alcohol misuse is a leading risk factor for suicide. Many life insurance policies cover death arising from suicide after the first year of cover. So some people, usually addicted to alcohol or other depressant drugs, often with co-morbid mental health problems, take out a life policy. Their intention is to commit suicide in order to provide for their families.

When, however, people who have taken out life insurance commit suicide a year into their insurance cover, the insurance company will usually seek access to their medical records. Suicide can be a rational choice but that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll