header-logo header-logo

30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

All bar none?

Banning people from pubs: a non-justiciable decision? asks Neil Parpworth

The recent decision in R (on the application of Proud) v Buckingham Pubwatch Scheme [2008] EWHC 2224 (Admin) addressed an important practical point; whether a person who had been banned from public houses in an area by local publicans was able to challenge the lawfulness of that decision in public law proceedings.
The facts

Buckingham Pubwatch Scheme (the scheme) is a group of publicans in the Buckinghamshire area. In March 2008, in the light of an incident which had occurred outside a public house, a decision was taken to ban the claimant from their pubs for life. Subsequently that decision was altered to a ban for a period of three years. The claimant sought judicial review of that decision. Permission to apply for review was originally refused by Mr Justice Simon. The claimant therefore submitted a renewed application which was heard by a deputy high court judge. The defendant, the scheme, did not appear before the court. Instead, its chairman was represented as an interested

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll