header-logo header-logo

11 April 2025 / Shivi Rajput
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce , Animal welfare
printer mail-detail

All bark, no bite?

215636
Is the UK playing catch-up in its lack of laws surrounding pet disputes? Shivi Rajput considers the current treatment of four-legged family members
  • The treatment of pets in divorce proceedings in England and Wales and internationally.
  • The recent case of FI v DO, in which the central dispute after family finances was the care of the family dog.
  • Ideas for reform to align the law with the emotional and practical importance of pets in families.

It is indisputable—Britain is a nation of dog lovers. With an estimated 33% of UK households owning a dog, they are the country’s most popular pet. Among millennials, the trend is even more pronounced, as many opt for ‘fur babies’ over traditional family structures.

Given the deep emotional bonds formed with pets, disputes over their ownership during divorce proceedings can be particularly contentious. However, despite their significance in family life, the law in England and Wales continues to classify pets as ‘chattels’—personal property akin to furniture or jewellery. This outdated framework

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll