header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
11 April 2025 / Shivi Rajput
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce , Animal welfare
printer mail-detail

All bark, no bite?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
215636
Is the UK playing catch-up in its lack of laws surrounding pet disputes? Shivi Rajput considers the current treatment of four-legged family members
  • The treatment of pets in divorce proceedings in England and Wales and internationally.
  • The recent case of FI v DO, in which the central dispute after family finances was the care of the family dog.
  • Ideas for reform to align the law with the emotional and practical importance of pets in families.

It is indisputable—Britain is a nation of dog lovers. With an estimated 33% of UK households owning a dog, they are the country’s most popular pet. Among millennials, the trend is even more pronounced, as many opt for ‘fur babies’ over traditional family structures.

Given the deep emotional bonds formed with pets, disputes over their ownership during divorce proceedings can be particularly contentious. However, despite their significance in family life, the law in England and Wales continues to classify pets as ‘chattels’—personal property akin to furniture or jewellery. This outdated framework

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll