header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

All bark, no bite?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
11 April 2025 / Shivi Rajput
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce , Animal welfare
printer mail-detail
215636
Is the UK playing catch-up in its lack of laws surrounding pet disputes? Shivi Rajput considers the current treatment of four-legged family members
  • The treatment of pets in divorce proceedings in England and Wales and internationally.
  • The recent case of FI v DO, in which the central dispute after family finances was the care of the family dog.
  • Ideas for reform to align the law with the emotional and practical importance of pets in families.

It is indisputable—Britain is a nation of dog lovers. With an estimated 33% of UK households owning a dog, they are the country’s most popular pet. Among millennials, the trend is even more pronounced, as many opt for ‘fur babies’ over traditional family structures.

Given the deep emotional bonds formed with pets, disputes over their ownership during divorce proceedings can be particularly contentious. However, despite their significance in family life, the law in England and Wales continues to classify pets as ‘chattels’—personal property akin to furniture or jewellery. This outdated framework

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

Francis Ho, Charles Russell Speechlys partner, was recently appointed chair of the Construction Law Committee of the City of London Law Society. He discusses the challenges of learning to lead, the importance of professional ethics, and the power of the written word, withNLJ

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Motor commissions & fiduciary duties
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
NLJ this week: The power of Interpol red notices
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Approach with caution post-Mazur
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
NLJ this week: Clarity on cladding
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
NLJ this week: Self-disclosure risks & rewards
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll