header-logo header-logo

25 July 2013 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

All change?

smith

Gender politics is the hot topic within the judiciary, notes Roger Smith

July is the time for judicial appointments. The new incumbents then take office at the beginning of the legal year. Additionally, the new Director of Public Prosecutions was announced this week. Inevitably, considerations of gender have been in the air.

The Lord Chief Justice

A predictable controversy surrounded the ascendancy of Sir John Thomas to the role of Lord Chief Justice. He beat Lady Justice Hallett, who would have been the first woman to take up the role. Lord Hacking, himself a barrister, wrote to The Times to report that “many in the legal profession and outside…have been dismayed by the process for the selection”. Others have muttered their dissent—or reported the alleged dissent of others—in less prestigious publications.

In reality, the appointment shows up the procedural difficulties in moving the senior judiciary from its largely male composition. Sir John is an experienced and respected judge. He knows his way around the corridors of power: he has been the judiciary’s representative

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll