header-logo header-logo

All change?

25 July 2013 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail
smith

Gender politics is the hot topic within the judiciary, notes Roger Smith

July is the time for judicial appointments. The new incumbents then take office at the beginning of the legal year. Additionally, the new Director of Public Prosecutions was announced this week. Inevitably, considerations of gender have been in the air.

The Lord Chief Justice

A predictable controversy surrounded the ascendancy of Sir John Thomas to the role of Lord Chief Justice. He beat Lady Justice Hallett, who would have been the first woman to take up the role. Lord Hacking, himself a barrister, wrote to The Times to report that “many in the legal profession and outside…have been dismayed by the process for the selection”. Others have muttered their dissent—or reported the alleged dissent of others—in less prestigious publications.

In reality, the appointment shows up the procedural difficulties in moving the senior judiciary from its largely male composition. Sir John is an experienced and respected judge. He knows his way around the corridors of power: he has been the judiciary’s representative

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll