header-logo header-logo

25 July 2013 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

All change?

smith

Gender politics is the hot topic within the judiciary, notes Roger Smith

July is the time for judicial appointments. The new incumbents then take office at the beginning of the legal year. Additionally, the new Director of Public Prosecutions was announced this week. Inevitably, considerations of gender have been in the air.

The Lord Chief Justice

A predictable controversy surrounded the ascendancy of Sir John Thomas to the role of Lord Chief Justice. He beat Lady Justice Hallett, who would have been the first woman to take up the role. Lord Hacking, himself a barrister, wrote to The Times to report that “many in the legal profession and outside…have been dismayed by the process for the selection”. Others have muttered their dissent—or reported the alleged dissent of others—in less prestigious publications.

In reality, the appointment shows up the procedural difficulties in moving the senior judiciary from its largely male composition. Sir John is an experienced and respected judge. He knows his way around the corridors of power: he has been the judiciary’s representative

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll