header-logo header-logo

07 June 2024 / Satnam Tumani
Issue: 8074 / Categories: Opinion , Fraud , Criminal , Commercial
printer mail-detail

All change at the top

176270
Satnam Tumani anticipates a more focused approach to tackling financial wrongdoings

Various changes have taken place at the top of the leading white collar enforcement agencies. Nick Ephgrave was recently appointed director of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO), Therese Chambers and Steve Smart were appointed to head up the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) enforcement division, and Stephen Parkinson has taken over as Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). Following the general election on 4 July, the UK will have a new government, with Sir Keir Starmer currently in pole position to become the next prime minster.

In my experience a change of political colour at the top often leads to a change in focus for the various financial crime enforcement agencies. This dynamic may be amplified this time around by dint of three reasons.

First, Sir Keir is a former DPP. Second, there appears to be great appetite for change, albeit little appetite for spending public money in the pursuit of that change. Third, we may not have seen the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll