header-logo header-logo

17 April 2019
Issue: 7837 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

All change on the farm

Agricultural tenants and landowners face far-reaching changes to the law on mortgages, repossession, apply to vary clauses and passing on tenancies to the next generation.

Defra published a consultation paper this month on ‘Reforming agricultural tenancies in England and Wales’, due to end on 2 July. It asks whether current restrictions on agricultural mortgages act as a barrier to letting farmland, and whether farmers unable to meet their repayments should be given greater protection against repossession.

Sarah Denney-Richards, head of agriculture at Thursfields, said: ‘Agricultural tenants and landowners need to be aware of these potential changes and the impact they could have.

‘Anyone who is concerned about the potential impact on their business and livelihood should take professional advice and ensure they monitor any changes that come into law.’

Key proposals include allowing Agricultural Holdings Act tenants to assign their tenancy for payment to a third party, subject to a landlord’s right both to buy out the tenant at the time and to end the new arrangement after 25 years.

The minimum age of 65 years for succession on retirement applications would be abolished, to encourage earlier retirement and succession planning. There would be a new dispute resolution mechanism for disputes concerning apply to vary clauses, where either party believes they present an ‘unreasonable barrier’ to land improvement or business development.

The consultation proposes extending the category of persons entitled to apply for succession to include cohabitees, nieces, nephews and grandchildren. It also suggests removing the ‘commercial unit test’ which prevents an applicant who already farms a commercial farm from applying to take a succession tenancy on.

Issue: 7837 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll