header-logo header-logo

18 October 2018 / Mark Chick
Issue: 7813 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

All change in residential leasehold?

Are we moving towards significant reforms in enfranchisement? Mark Chick examines the key points from the Law Commission’s recent consultation paper

The Law Commission’s consultation paper on proposed reforms to enfranchisement legislation, published on 20 September, runs to 564 pages and asks for views on 135 questions relating to the proposed changes, some of which are quite radical. A copy of the consultation, Leasehold home ownership: buying your freehold or extending your lease , which closes on 20 November 2018 can be found here.

The proposed reforms, some of which are outlined below, make sweeping changes to the whole process of enfranchisement and also propose radical reform to the basis of valuation aiming ‘reduce the price’ paid on enfranchisement. There are also suggestions of a fixed or no-costs regime for landlords, and so the proposed changes are therefore in essence political as they seek to reverse the emphasis between landlords and tenants.

The most sweeping suggestion from a technical point of view is the suggestion that there should be a single scheme of enfranchisement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll