header-logo header-logo

04 June 2025
Issue: 8119 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

All complaints to be recorded under SRA & BSB proposals

The regulators of both barristers and solicitors have launched consultations on the way lawyers handle complaints

Barristers would have a professional duty to inform their chambers or the Bar Standards Board (BSB) of any complaints they receive, under proposed changes to the Bar Handbook.

In a consultation published last week, the BSB said it would analyse the data on complaints ‘on a regular basis’ to identify any trends or risks that might emerge. Failure to report complaints could be sanctioned by ‘regulatory action, including supervision and enforcement action’.

The BSB would provide guidance or even supervision to ‘barristers with disproportionately high levels of first-tier complaints, premature complaints to the Legal Ombudsman, or more generally identified weaknesses in complaints handling’.

The consultation, ‘New arrangements and rules for first-tier complaints handling’, closes on 6 August.

Mark Neale, director general of the BSB, said: ‘Consumers must have confidence that their complaints will be fairly assessed and dealt with efficiently, effectively and fairly at the first available opportunity.’

Under changes proposed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) last week, solicitors would be obliged to give clients information on how to complain once their legal matter is concluded as well as on request or on receipt of a complaint.

Currently, solicitors must publish details of their complaints handling procedure on their website or make this information available on request if they don’t have a website. According to the SRA, only about 68% of firms with websites do this.

The SRA proposes changing the requirement to ensure complaints information is treated in the same way as costs—displayed in a place that is easy for the public to locate, clearly signposted and easy to understand.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘Solicitors shouldn't be afraid of encouraging complaints.’

The SRA consultation, ‘Changing our requirements on first-tier complaints’, began last week and closes on 25 July.

Issue: 8119 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll