header-logo header-logo

04 June 2025
Issue: 8119 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

All complaints to be recorded under SRA & BSB proposals

The regulators of both barristers and solicitors have launched consultations on the way lawyers handle complaints

Barristers would have a professional duty to inform their chambers or the Bar Standards Board (BSB) of any complaints they receive, under proposed changes to the Bar Handbook.

In a consultation published last week, the BSB said it would analyse the data on complaints ‘on a regular basis’ to identify any trends or risks that might emerge. Failure to report complaints could be sanctioned by ‘regulatory action, including supervision and enforcement action’.

The BSB would provide guidance or even supervision to ‘barristers with disproportionately high levels of first-tier complaints, premature complaints to the Legal Ombudsman, or more generally identified weaknesses in complaints handling’.

The consultation, ‘New arrangements and rules for first-tier complaints handling’, closes on 6 August.

Mark Neale, director general of the BSB, said: ‘Consumers must have confidence that their complaints will be fairly assessed and dealt with efficiently, effectively and fairly at the first available opportunity.’

Under changes proposed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) last week, solicitors would be obliged to give clients information on how to complain once their legal matter is concluded as well as on request or on receipt of a complaint.

Currently, solicitors must publish details of their complaints handling procedure on their website or make this information available on request if they don’t have a website. According to the SRA, only about 68% of firms with websites do this.

The SRA proposes changing the requirement to ensure complaints information is treated in the same way as costs—displayed in a place that is easy for the public to locate, clearly signposted and easy to understand.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘Solicitors shouldn't be afraid of encouraging complaints.’

The SRA consultation, ‘Changing our requirements on first-tier complaints’, began last week and closes on 25 July.

Issue: 8119 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll