header-logo header-logo

05 August 2016 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7710 / Categories: Features , EU , Human rights
printer mail-detail

All in due course?

nlj_7710_parpworth

Neil Parpworth takes stock of where we are at in relation to human rights reform

  • How will Theresa May’s government deal with the proposed repeal of the Human Rights Act 1998, especially now that the EU Referendum outcome has led to a whole host of issues which will need to be prioritised?

Repealing the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) and replacing it with a British Bill of Rights is, for some, a solution in search of a problem. Nevertheless, the Conservative government under David Cameron announced in its manifesto prior to the 7 May 2015 General Election that if elected, this was one of the reforms it would introduce. Thus as the then Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, Michael Gove MP, asserted on a number of occasions, the government had a mandate for human rights reform. It was therefore believed in advance of the 2015 Queen’s Speech that a Bill would be announced. Instead, the two Houses were informed that: “My government will bring forward proposals for a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll