header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
11 July 2014 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7614 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

All inclusive?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
specialist_employment_pigott

The ECJ has opened the way to higher holiday pay for workers on commission, says Charles Pigott

Having spent over 10 years grappling with entitlement to statutory holiday pay, the courts are now turning their attention to how it is calculated. The latest development is the decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Lock v British Gas Trading Limited C-539-12 , which was published just in time for the late spring bank holiday.

The story so far

Lock is a reference made by the Leicester employment tribunal in late 2012 about the interpretation of Art 7 of the Working Time Directive 2003/88/EC, which establishes entitlement to four weeks’ paid annual leave across the EU. Around 60% of Mr Lock’s pay came from sales-based commission, but his holiday pay was based on his basic salary alone. As there was some time lag between closing the sales and receiving the commission they generated, Lock was not so much complaining about receiving too little pay when he was on holiday, but his inability to generate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll