header-logo header-logo

11 July 2014 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7614 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

All inclusive?

specialist_employment_pigott

The ECJ has opened the way to higher holiday pay for workers on commission, says Charles Pigott

Having spent over 10 years grappling with entitlement to statutory holiday pay, the courts are now turning their attention to how it is calculated. The latest development is the decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Lock v British Gas Trading Limited C-539-12 , which was published just in time for the late spring bank holiday.

The story so far

Lock is a reference made by the Leicester employment tribunal in late 2012 about the interpretation of Art 7 of the Working Time Directive 2003/88/EC, which establishes entitlement to four weeks’ paid annual leave across the EU. Around 60% of Mr Lock’s pay came from sales-based commission, but his holiday pay was based on his basic salary alone. As there was some time lag between closing the sales and receiving the commission they generated, Lock was not so much complaining about receiving too little pay when he was on holiday, but his inability to generate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll