header-logo header-logo

10 November 2017 / David Greene
Issue: 7769 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

All for one, & one for all?

Post Unison , the government, the courts & the profession are all looking at the issue of access to justice & what it means to ensure it’s a reality, says David Greene

Remarkably, access to justice has become a topic to discuss again and perhaps there is a mood change in those discussions away from the penury that has been meted out to both civil and criminal justice over the past 10 years.

The Supreme Court started the latest round of debate in July with its ground breaking judgment in R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51. The bench took up the argument that many have sought to press for many years against the cuts in legal aid, some of the Jackson reforms and the increases in court fees, namely that the ability to access the justice process is not just for the good of the parties to a particular claim but for the good of society as a whole. The court commented that the view that the justice process only serves
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll