header-logo header-logo

19 April 2024
Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

AlphaBiolabs advise the MOCCA test (plus 15% off all tests for NLJ readers)

Ever wondered about the reasoning behind the MOCCA and MOCCA-B drug tests frequently sought by family law professionals, social workers and local authorities?

Lawyers are often advised to order these particular tests—but why?

‘We routinely test for a wide variety of drugs and their metabolites (breakdown products),’ says Marie Law, head of toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, a UKAS-accredited laboratory with over 20 years’ experience in drug testing for legal matters.

‘Yet of all the substances we test for at our laboratory, there are a handful, known by the acronyms of MOCCA and MOCCA-B, that show up time and time again in legal drug test results. They are also widely recognised as some of the most misused substances in the UK.’

MOCCA is an acronym standing for methamphetamine, opiates (including heroin), cocaine (including crack cocaine), cannabis and amphetamines.  

MOCCA-B encompasses all of these, and adds benzodiazepines.

AlphaBiolabs tends to advise its customers to test for the MOCCA or MOCCA-B range for several reasons.

First of all, as Law explains, ‘testing for these substances together can provide clarity in circumstances where it is unclear which substance(s) an individual may have used.

‘This is crucial where important safeguarding decisions need to be made, such as in child welfare cases.’

Secondly, Law says: ‘Testing for a wide range of drugs means that the appropriate treatment and rehabilitation plans can be put in place, in line with the substances that have been used.’

Thirdly, Law says: ‘Street drugs are often “cut” with a variety of substances to create or enhance the desired effect of the high, without the knowledge of the person purchasing and consuming the drugs.

‘This means that a comprehensive drug test might find “unexpected” substances in the donor’s sample that may not have been disclosed at the time samples were collected.’

AlphaBiolabs is offering legal clients 15% off its drug testing until 30 June 2024. Simply cite DRUG15 when requesting your quote.

It also promises rapid results with sample collections from any location within 24 to 48 hours of instruction, a wide range of testing including hair, nail, urine and oral fluid samples, and free legally instructed sample collections at its nationwide walk-in centres.

Find out more at alphabiolabs.co.uk, email testing@alphabiolabs.com or call 0333 600 1300. 
Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll