header-logo header-logo

AlphaBiolabs advise the MOCCA test (plus 15% off all tests for NLJ readers)

19 April 2024
Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Ever wondered about the reasoning behind the MOCCA and MOCCA-B drug tests frequently sought by family law professionals, social workers and local authorities?

Lawyers are often advised to order these particular tests—but why?

‘We routinely test for a wide variety of drugs and their metabolites (breakdown products),’ says Marie Law, head of toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, a UKAS-accredited laboratory with over 20 years’ experience in drug testing for legal matters.

‘Yet of all the substances we test for at our laboratory, there are a handful, known by the acronyms of MOCCA and MOCCA-B, that show up time and time again in legal drug test results. They are also widely recognised as some of the most misused substances in the UK.’

MOCCA is an acronym standing for methamphetamine, opiates (including heroin), cocaine (including crack cocaine), cannabis and amphetamines.  

MOCCA-B encompasses all of these, and adds benzodiazepines.

AlphaBiolabs tends to advise its customers to test for the MOCCA or MOCCA-B range for several reasons.

First of all, as Law explains, ‘testing for these substances together can provide clarity in circumstances where it is unclear which substance(s) an individual may have used.

‘This is crucial where important safeguarding decisions need to be made, such as in child welfare cases.’

Secondly, Law says: ‘Testing for a wide range of drugs means that the appropriate treatment and rehabilitation plans can be put in place, in line with the substances that have been used.’

Thirdly, Law says: ‘Street drugs are often “cut” with a variety of substances to create or enhance the desired effect of the high, without the knowledge of the person purchasing and consuming the drugs.

‘This means that a comprehensive drug test might find “unexpected” substances in the donor’s sample that may not have been disclosed at the time samples were collected.’

AlphaBiolabs is offering legal clients 15% off its drug testing until 30 June 2024. Simply cite DRUG15 when requesting your quote.

It also promises rapid results with sample collections from any location within 24 to 48 hours of instruction, a wide range of testing including hair, nail, urine and oral fluid samples, and free legally instructed sample collections at its nationwide walk-in centres.

Find out more at alphabiolabs.co.uk, email testing@alphabiolabs.com or call 0333 600 1300. 
Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll