header-logo header-logo

13 October 2011 / Mark Surguy , Tracey Stretton
Issue: 7485 / Categories: Features , E-disclosure , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

An altered state

Tracey Stretton & Mark Surguy predict that change is in the air for litigation costs

In his review of the costs of civil litigation, Lord Justice Jackson suggests that a formal costs management process is needed to keep the costs of litigation in check and makes recommendations about the need for budgeting and the monitoring of costs by judges. Pilot projects have been run over the past two years, including a pilot in the Mercantile Court and Technology and Construction Courts in Birmingham. The Civil Procedure Rules Committee recently approved the extension of this pilot to every Mercantile Court and Technology and Construction Court in the country.

The target date for the implementation of various reforms suggested by Jackson LJ, including the introduction of the costs management process, is 1 October 2012. A new practice direction on costs management is expected to be introduced in October 2012, once the necessary changes to the civil procedures rules have been authorised and enabling

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll