header-logo header-logo

An altered state

13 October 2011 / Mark Surguy , Tracey Stretton
Issue: 7485 / Categories: Features , E-disclosure , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Tracey Stretton & Mark Surguy predict that change is in the air for litigation costs

In his review of the costs of civil litigation, Lord Justice Jackson suggests that a formal costs management process is needed to keep the costs of litigation in check and makes recommendations about the need for budgeting and the monitoring of costs by judges. Pilot projects have been run over the past two years, including a pilot in the Mercantile Court and Technology and Construction Courts in Birmingham. The Civil Procedure Rules Committee recently approved the extension of this pilot to every Mercantile Court and Technology and Construction Court in the country.

The target date for the implementation of various reforms suggested by Jackson LJ, including the introduction of the costs management process, is 1 October 2012. A new practice direction on costs management is expected to be introduced in October 2012, once the necessary changes to the civil procedures rules have been authorised and enabling

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll