header-logo header-logo

13 October 2011 / Mark Surguy , Tracey Stretton
Issue: 7485 / Categories: Features , E-disclosure , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

An altered state

Tracey Stretton & Mark Surguy predict that change is in the air for litigation costs

In his review of the costs of civil litigation, Lord Justice Jackson suggests that a formal costs management process is needed to keep the costs of litigation in check and makes recommendations about the need for budgeting and the monitoring of costs by judges. Pilot projects have been run over the past two years, including a pilot in the Mercantile Court and Technology and Construction Courts in Birmingham. The Civil Procedure Rules Committee recently approved the extension of this pilot to every Mercantile Court and Technology and Construction Court in the country.

The target date for the implementation of various reforms suggested by Jackson LJ, including the introduction of the costs management process, is 1 October 2012. A new practice direction on costs management is expected to be introduced in October 2012, once the necessary changes to the civil procedures rules have been authorised and enabling

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll