header-logo header-logo

Amazon class action

12 June 2024
Issue: 8075 / Categories: Legal News , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

UK retailers have launched a class action for £1bn damages against Amazon at the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT)

The claim is being brought by the British Independent Retailers Association (BIRA) on an opt-out basis, under which all UK retailers who have lost out are automatically included in the claim unless they explicitly opt out.

The retailers allege that, since October 2015, Amazon has misused non-public data belonging to the retailers to boost its own sales and price-setting of rival products.

Boris Bronfentrinker of Willkie Farr & Gallagher, acting for BIRA, said: ‘This is precisely the sort of claim that the new collective action regime was brought in for, to enable small and medium-sized businesses to be able to recover damages caused to them by a huge multinational.’

Amazon has consistently denied the allegations.

Issue: 8075 / Categories: Legal News , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll