header-logo header-logo

19 June 2024
Issue: 8076 / Categories: Legal News , International , International justice , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

An abundance of arbitration in 2023

The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) enjoyed an uptick in case filings in 2023, it reported last week

It registered 890 arbitration cases (compared to 710 in 2022), and had 1,766 pending cases (compared to 1,670 in 2022) being administered by year-end via its offices in Paris, Hong Kong, New York, São Paulo, Singapore and Abu Dhabi Global Market.

ICC International Court of Arbitration president Claudia Salomon said: ‘Our preliminary statistics represent the continued trust that parties around the world place in ICC to resolve their disputes, regardless of the amount in dispute, counterparty or industry sector.’

The report notes an increase in the number of parties from Central and Eastern Europe (277 parties, up from 188 in 2022), North America (308, up from 207 in 2022), and the Middle East (288, up from 198 in 2022). 

France, the UK, Switzerland, the US and Brazil remained the top five seats of arbitration.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll