header-logo header-logo

Lawyers' fees: an ungodly jumble?

16 September 2022 / William Gibson
Issue: 7994 / Categories: Features , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail
93939
William Gibson discusses how the current barristers’ strike is attracting attention to legal fees—again

Payne J in 1976, dealing with a costs appeal, said: ‘Paying low fees could work against the public good’. He added: ‘It was important to reach a proper balance between preventing litigation becoming so expensive as to make justice unattainable by many members of the public and the factor of providing that solicitors and counsel should be adequately remunerated’. That paragraph could almost have been a quote from the Woolf or Jackson proposals. A few years later Lord Denning famously called the whole subject of legal costs ‘an ungodly jumble’ and trying to make sense of that jumble has occupied costs professionals for decades. One basic factor since 1976 remains unchanged: solicitors just want a fair and reasonable return for the time and effort put into keeping in place a system of civil litigation of which practitioners are rightly proud. Achieving that aim will require the services of costs professionals for years to come. Although

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll