header-logo header-logo

24 July 2026 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 8171 / Categories: Features , National security , Human rights , Public
printer mail-detail

Analysing the proscription of Palestine Action

255689
© NEIL HALL/EPA/Shutterstock
Nicholas Dobson lifts the bonnet on the Court of Appeal ruling which held that government was within its rights to ban the group
  • Covers the legal reasoning and factual background of Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (Huda Ammori), where the Court of Appeal held in favour of the home secretary and set aside the quashing order made by the Divisional Court on 25 February 2026.

On 23 June 2025, the home secretary announced she had decided to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation under s 3 of the Terrorism Act 2000 (TA 2000). Following approval by both Houses of Parliament, a proscription order came into effect on 5 July 2025. Although the Divisional Court quashed the proscription decision on 13 February 2026 (holding it both inconsistent with the home secretary’s proscription policy and disproportionate), the Court of Appeal on 15 June 2026 upheld the Home Secretary’s decision. This was The Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (Huda Ammori) [2026]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
Bill disputes between solicitors and clients should be dealt with by an online portal rather than sent to the Legal Ombudsman (LeO), the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) has argued
MPs have warned of an ‘unacceptably high risk of miscarriages of justice’ due to a lack of legal aid and increasing levels of self-representation
The government is considering restricting judicial review challenges against housing schemes, motorways and other major planning applications
Damages-based agreements (DBAs), also known as contingency fees, could be allowed for opt-out collective actions in the Competition Appeal Tribunal
Couples could legally marry almost anywhere, from canal boats to cruise ships at sea, under proposals launched last week
back-to-top-scroll