header-logo header-logo

24 July 2026 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 8171 / Categories: Features , National security , Human rights , Public
printer mail-detail

Analysing the proscription of Palestine Action

255689
© NEIL HALL/EPA/Shutterstock
Nicholas Dobson lifts the bonnet on the Court of Appeal ruling which held that government was within its rights to ban the group
  • Covers the legal reasoning and factual background of Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (Huda Ammori), where the Court of Appeal held in favour of the home secretary and set aside the quashing order made by the Divisional Court on 25 February 2026.

On 23 June 2025, the home secretary announced she had decided to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation under s 3 of the Terrorism Act 2000 (TA 2000). Following approval by both Houses of Parliament, a proscription order came into effect on 5 July 2025. Although the Divisional Court quashed the proscription decision on 13 February 2026 (holding it both inconsistent with the home secretary’s proscription policy and disproportionate), the Court of Appeal on 15 June 2026 upheld the Home Secretary’s decision. This was The Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (Huda Ammori) [2026]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll