header-logo header-logo

26 May 2011
Issue: 7467 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Ancillary relief—Divorce—Financial provision

K v L [2011] EWCA Civ 550, [2011] All ER (D) 124 (May)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division Laws, Jacob and Wilson LJJ, 13 May 2011

The Court of Appeal has reviewed the circumstances in which it would be appropriate to limit a husband’s award to a “generous assessment of his needs”.

Martin Pointer QC and Geoffrey Kingscote for the husband. Lucy Stone QC and Duncan Brooks for the wife.

The husband and wife were in a relationship for 21 years and had three children. When the wife was aged 15 she inherited shares. When the parties separated in 2007, the shares were worth £28m. Throughout the marriage neither party generated any earned income. The parties lived modestly—the family’s average net average expenditure during the later years of the marriage was £79,000 and the former matrimonial property was worth £225,000.

Following separation, the husband’s claims against the wife for interim support reflected the modesty of the previous family expenditure. He sought £30,000 for himself in 2007 and £48,000 for himself in 2008. However, for the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll