header-logo header-logo

26 May 2011
Issue: 7467 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Ancillary relief—Divorce—Financial provision

K v L [2011] EWCA Civ 550, [2011] All ER (D) 124 (May)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division Laws, Jacob and Wilson LJJ, 13 May 2011

The Court of Appeal has reviewed the circumstances in which it would be appropriate to limit a husband’s award to a “generous assessment of his needs”.

Martin Pointer QC and Geoffrey Kingscote for the husband. Lucy Stone QC and Duncan Brooks for the wife.

The husband and wife were in a relationship for 21 years and had three children. When the wife was aged 15 she inherited shares. When the parties separated in 2007, the shares were worth £28m. Throughout the marriage neither party generated any earned income. The parties lived modestly—the family’s average net average expenditure during the later years of the marriage was £79,000 and the former matrimonial property was worth £225,000.

Following separation, the husband’s claims against the wife for interim support reflected the modesty of the previous family expenditure. He sought £30,000 for himself in 2007 and £48,000 for himself in 2008. However, for the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll