header-logo header-logo

01 October 2024
Issue: 8088 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-detail

Anger as compensation levy triples

Solicitors’ contributions to the Compensation Fund are to rise from £30 to £90 for individuals and from £660 to £2,220 for firms, the Legal Services Board (LSB) has confirmed

The increases, due to take effect this month as solicitors renew their practising certificates, have arisen as a result of Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) interventions ‘into 65 legal services practices in 2022/23 including Metamorph Group and Axiom Ince’, the SRA said. This brought total expenditure from the fund to £64.9m, up from £22.4m the previous year.

Consequently, the fund’s reserves dropped to a low point of £18.7m in July 2023.

The SRA says it anticipates collecting £31.6m in 2024/25—a ‘significant’ increase on this year’s £10m—which it considers ‘will set the Compensation Fund at a level where it can continue to be managed on a sound financial basis’.

However, Law Society chief executive officer Ian Jeffery described the increase as ‘deeply concerning’.

Jeffery said: ‘We also strongly encourage the SRA to prioritise its focus on core activities and only undertake additional workstreams based on evidence of regulatory need, or specific gaps in responding to consumer needs, rather than looking for additional fining powers.

‘In our consultation response, the Law Society asked the SRA to reconsider how the levy was apportioned, to ensure the burden was distributed fairly, and to take proactive measures to prevent future substantial claims. Solicitors are steadfast in their wide support for the Compensation Fund, as a vital protection for clients, and it clearly delineates the profession from unregulated providers of legal services.’

Tensions between the Law Society and SRA have also escalated over proposals to increase fining powers on solicitors. In June, the SRA proposed introducing two more fining bands: Band E, 6-10% of a firm’s annual domestic turnover and 113-115% of an individual’s income; and Band F, 11-25% of annual domestic turnover and upwards of 145% of an individual’s income.

However, Law Society vice president Richard Atkinson said the proposals were ‘unfair, disproportionate and potentially unlawful’, and risked cutting the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal ‘out of the process’ even though the tribunal has a wider range of sanctions available.

Issue: 8088 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll