header-logo header-logo

29 March 2016
Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Ania Farren—BLP

Firm’s international arbitration team boosted by partner hire

International law firm Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP) today announces the appointment of Ania Farren as a partner to further bolster the firm’s growing international arbitration practice.

Ania joins BLP on 1 May 2016 and will be based in London. She joins BLP from K&L Gates, where she played a key role in building up the profile and reputation of the firm’s arbitration practices. Ania is viewed as one of the ‘up and coming’ international arbitrators in the UK, has exceptional knowledge of the international arbitration community and considerable experience in investor/state arbitrations. Her excellent technical ability will provide even greater bench strength to the firm’s London based team.

At BLP Ania will focus on advising clients across the network, with particular emphasis on London, Moscow, Asia and the Middle East where the firm’s international arbitration practices are strong. Using her experience and connections she will also help to develop the firm’s client base in sectors including energy, which is a key focus for BLP, along with infrastructure, construction, financial institutions, commodities and manufacturing.

Nathan Willmott, head of litigation and corporate risk, BLP, comments: “Ania is a fantastic addition to the team and her focus on major energy, commodities and infrastructure disputes fits perfectly with our core strengths. Although based in London, she will work closely with our international arbitration practices across Hong Kong, Singapore, Moscow, Abu Dhabi and Dubai. With the volatility in oil prices set to continue, many of our clients are facing difficult times and Ania’s addition to the global team will enable us to offer them an even stronger capability. 

“Ania is already a leading figure among the arbitration community and her experience and skills are a perfect fit for our international arbitration practice. We look forward to working with her to help meet the demands of our clients both in London and globally.”

Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll