header-logo header-logo

06 October 2011
Issue: 7484 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Animals

Bodey v Hall [2011] EWHC 2162 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 149 (Sep)

The claim was brought in connection with an accident which occurred while the parties were in a pony trap. Both were experienced horsewomen. The claimant was acting as groom, while the defendant was driving. It was not clear whether or not the claimant wore a riding hat at the instant time. The horse became startled and rushed forward, so that the claimant and defendant were thrown onto the ground.

The claimant sustained a severe head injury. In subsequent proceedings, it was held that, in order to determine whether the requirements of s 2(2)(a) of the Animals Act 1971 were satisfied, it was necessary to consider the particular circumstances of the instant case, and not to only consider the animal itself and whether it was likely to cause severe personal injury.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll