header-logo header-logo

Animals

06 October 2011
Issue: 7484 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Bodey v Hall [2011] EWHC 2162 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 149 (Sep)

The claim was brought in connection with an accident which occurred while the parties were in a pony trap. Both were experienced horsewomen. The claimant was acting as groom, while the defendant was driving. It was not clear whether or not the claimant wore a riding hat at the instant time. The horse became startled and rushed forward, so that the claimant and defendant were thrown onto the ground.

The claimant sustained a severe head injury. In subsequent proceedings, it was held that, in order to determine whether the requirements of s 2(2)(a) of the Animals Act 1971 were satisfied, it was necessary to consider the particular circumstances of the instant case, and not to only consider the animal itself and whether it was likely to cause severe personal injury.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll