header-logo header-logo

06 October 2011
Issue: 7484 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Animals

Bodey v Hall [2011] EWHC 2162 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 149 (Sep)

The claim was brought in connection with an accident which occurred while the parties were in a pony trap. Both were experienced horsewomen. The claimant was acting as groom, while the defendant was driving. It was not clear whether or not the claimant wore a riding hat at the instant time. The horse became startled and rushed forward, so that the claimant and defendant were thrown onto the ground.

The claimant sustained a severe head injury. In subsequent proceedings, it was held that, in order to determine whether the requirements of s 2(2)(a) of the Animals Act 1971 were satisfied, it was necessary to consider the particular circumstances of the instant case, and not to only consider the animal itself and whether it was likely to cause severe personal injury.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll