header-logo header-logo

26 March 2009 / Stephen Levinson
Issue: 7362 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Human rights , Employment
printer mail-detail

Another fine mess

Stephen Levinson discusses the law affecting care workers after Allen

The need to protect vulnerable adults in care and children in schools, nurseries and other places is self-evident. This case is about the legal system that ensures that those who pose a risk are not allowed to care for them. Brought by the Royal College of Nurses, it related to those who look after adults but the system is the same as that previously established for the protection of children under the Education Reform Act 1988 and the Protection of Children Act 1999 (PCA 1999). The political impetus for that law was driven by the public outcry against paedophiles.

Unsuitability

The system adopted by the Care Standards Act 2000 (CSA 2000) is that care workers employed in looking after vulnerable adults may be placed on a list of people considered unsuitable for the work (the POVA, Protection of Vulnerable Adults, list). Once on the list on a provisional or confirmed basis the care worker is banned from such employment. The question was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll