header-logo header-logo

26 March 2009 / Stephen Levinson
Issue: 7362 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Human rights , Employment
printer mail-detail

Another fine mess

Stephen Levinson discusses the law affecting care workers after Allen

The need to protect vulnerable adults in care and children in schools, nurseries and other places is self-evident. This case is about the legal system that ensures that those who pose a risk are not allowed to care for them. Brought by the Royal College of Nurses, it related to those who look after adults but the system is the same as that previously established for the protection of children under the Education Reform Act 1988 and the Protection of Children Act 1999 (PCA 1999). The political impetus for that law was driven by the public outcry against paedophiles.

Unsuitability

The system adopted by the Care Standards Act 2000 (CSA 2000) is that care workers employed in looking after vulnerable adults may be placed on a list of people considered unsuitable for the work (the POVA, Protection of Vulnerable Adults, list). Once on the list on a provisional or confirmed basis the care worker is banned from such employment. The question was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll