header-logo header-logo

Appeal to reason

28 January 2010 / Roger Smithers
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Roger Smithers resolves some Pt 52 conundrums

Anyone contemplating a second tier civil appeal would do well to reflect carefully on the provisions of the Civil Procedure Rules before embarking on the process. Indeed, in this article it is suggested that the meaning and full effect of Pt 52 of the CPR with regard to the requirement for permission is not as clear as it might be.

If this seems a surprising view after some nine years under the new regime, consider this: most practitioners will be aware that permission to appeal is generally required. What is not so widely appreciated is that there can only be one application for permission to appeal to any one appeal court in the same proceedings. If that is refused, that is the end of the line. 

The CPR

Rule 52.3 deals with permission and provides:
(2) An application for permission to appeal may be made-
(a) to the lower court at the hearing at which the decision to be appealed  was made; or
(b) to the appeal court in an appeal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll