header-logo header-logo

28 January 2010 / Roger Smithers
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Appeal to reason

Roger Smithers resolves some Pt 52 conundrums

Anyone contemplating a second tier civil appeal would do well to reflect carefully on the provisions of the Civil Procedure Rules before embarking on the process. Indeed, in this article it is suggested that the meaning and full effect of Pt 52 of the CPR with regard to the requirement for permission is not as clear as it might be.

If this seems a surprising view after some nine years under the new regime, consider this: most practitioners will be aware that permission to appeal is generally required. What is not so widely appreciated is that there can only be one application for permission to appeal to any one appeal court in the same proceedings. If that is refused, that is the end of the line. 

The CPR

Rule 52.3 deals with permission and provides:
(2) An application for permission to appeal may be made-
(a) to the lower court at the hearing at which the decision to be appealed  was made; or
(b) to the appeal court in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll