header-logo header-logo

28 January 2010 / Roger Smithers
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Appeal to reason

Roger Smithers resolves some Pt 52 conundrums

Anyone contemplating a second tier civil appeal would do well to reflect carefully on the provisions of the Civil Procedure Rules before embarking on the process. Indeed, in this article it is suggested that the meaning and full effect of Pt 52 of the CPR with regard to the requirement for permission is not as clear as it might be.

If this seems a surprising view after some nine years under the new regime, consider this: most practitioners will be aware that permission to appeal is generally required. What is not so widely appreciated is that there can only be one application for permission to appeal to any one appeal court in the same proceedings. If that is refused, that is the end of the line. 

The CPR

Rule 52.3 deals with permission and provides:
(2) An application for permission to appeal may be made-
(a) to the lower court at the hearing at which the decision to be appealed  was made; or
(b) to the appeal court in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll