header-logo header-logo

Applicants at risk in ‘significant’ legal aid security breach

19 May 2025
Issue: 8117 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Technology , Cybercrime
printer mail-detail
An entire cohort of people who applied for legal aid in the past 15 years has been warned to be on guard following a major cyber-attack at the Legal Aid Agency (LAA)

The LAA said it discovered the attack on 23 April, taking immediate action to bolster security and inform legal aid providers. However, on 16 May, it discovered the attack was more extensive than first thought.

The LAA believes the hackers have accessed and downloaded a ‘significant amount’ of personal data from those who applied for legal aid through its digital service since 2010.

This data may include contact details and addresses of applicants, their dates of birth, national ID numbers, criminal history, employment status and financial data such as contribution amounts, debts and payments.

Jane Harbottle, the LAA’s chief executive officer, said: ‘I understand this news will be shocking and upsetting for people and I am extremely sorry this has happened.’

In a statement, the LAA advised all those potentially affected to be ‘alert for any suspicious activity such as unknown messages or phone calls and to be extra vigilant to update any potentially exposed passwords’. It warned against providing information to anyone contacting them unless they had first independently verified their identity.

Colin Witcher, barrister at Church Court Chambers, said: ‘As a result of this recent attack, a review of the LAA's data retention policy will be required as, notably, personal material has been accessed and downloaded dating back to 2010, bringing into question why this data was still retained and accessible.’

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘The incident once again demonstrates the need for sustained investment to bring the LAA’s antiquated IT system up to date and ensure the public have continued trust in the justice system.

‘The fragility of the IT system has prevented vital reforms, including updates to the means test that could help millions more access legal aid, and interim payments for firms whose cashflow is being decimated by the backlogs in the courts, through no fault of their own. If it is now also proving vulnerable to cyber-attack, further delay is untenable.’
Issue: 8117 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Technology , Cybercrime
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll