header-logo header-logo

Applicants at risk in ‘significant’ legal aid security breach

19 May 2025
Issue: 8117 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Technology , Cybercrime
printer mail-detail
An entire cohort of people who applied for legal aid in the past 15 years has been warned to be on guard following a major cyber-attack at the Legal Aid Agency (LAA)

The LAA said it discovered the attack on 23 April, taking immediate action to bolster security and inform legal aid providers. However, on 16 May, it discovered the attack was more extensive than first thought.

The LAA believes the hackers have accessed and downloaded a ‘significant amount’ of personal data from those who applied for legal aid through its digital service since 2010.

This data may include contact details and addresses of applicants, their dates of birth, national ID numbers, criminal history, employment status and financial data such as contribution amounts, debts and payments.

Jane Harbottle, the LAA’s chief executive officer, said: ‘I understand this news will be shocking and upsetting for people and I am extremely sorry this has happened.’

In a statement, the LAA advised all those potentially affected to be ‘alert for any suspicious activity such as unknown messages or phone calls and to be extra vigilant to update any potentially exposed passwords’. It warned against providing information to anyone contacting them unless they had first independently verified their identity.

Colin Witcher, barrister at Church Court Chambers, said: ‘As a result of this recent attack, a review of the LAA's data retention policy will be required as, notably, personal material has been accessed and downloaded dating back to 2010, bringing into question why this data was still retained and accessible.’

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘The incident once again demonstrates the need for sustained investment to bring the LAA’s antiquated IT system up to date and ensure the public have continued trust in the justice system.

‘The fragility of the IT system has prevented vital reforms, including updates to the means test that could help millions more access legal aid, and interim payments for firms whose cashflow is being decimated by the backlogs in the courts, through no fault of their own. If it is now also proving vulnerable to cyber-attack, further delay is untenable.’
Issue: 8117 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Technology , Cybercrime
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Declan Goodwin & Elinor Owen

Clarke Willmott—Declan Goodwin & Elinor Owen

Corporate and commercial teams in Cardiff boosted by dual partner hire

Hill Dickinson—Joz Coetzer & Marc Naidoo

Hill Dickinson—Joz Coetzer & Marc Naidoo

London hires to lead UK launch of international finance team

Switalskis—11 promotions

Switalskis—11 promotions

Firm marks start of year with firmwide promotions round

NEWS
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The next generation is inheriting more than assets—it is inheriting complexity. Writing in NLJ this week, experts from Penningtons Manches Cooper chart how global mobility, blended families and evolving values are reshaping private wealth advice
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming sport, from recruitment and training to officiating and fan engagement. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys at Law explains how AI now influences everything from injury prevention to tactical decisions, with clubs using tools such as ‘TacticAI’ to gain competitive edges
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll