header-logo header-logo

Approach with care

28 January 2010 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Dr Chris Pamplin explains how to save money without damaging the supply of expert witnesses

In recent years, pressure on public finances has driven down fees for those lawyers who still work in the publicly funded arena. Fee capping and fixed fee schemes have played their part. Clearly, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) believes that what was sauce for the lawyer goose will be sauce for the expert witness gander.

In its consultation paper, Legal Aid: Funding Reforms, the MoJ claims to recognise that quality expert evidence is essential for the effective running of the civil and criminal justice systems. Yet it proposes the unsophisticated application of arbitrary banding and capping of the fee rate of those expert witnesses paid out of the Legal Aid fund, with a maximum hourly fee of £100.

Based on a decade’s-worth of survey data (www.jspubs.com/downloads/PDFs/UKREW_MoJ_Nov09.pdf) gathered by the UK Register of Expert Witnesses, this action will represent an approximate halving of the average fee rates for medical expert witnesses.
Doubtless few lawyers will worry much

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll