header-logo header-logo

20 June 2013
Issue: 7565 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

Philip Hanby Ltd v Clarke [2013] EWCA Civ 647, [2013] All ER (D) 107 (Jun)

It was settled law that: (i) the court referred to in s 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 was the High Court; (ii) accordingly, only the High Court could give or refuse permission to appeal an arbitrary award pursuant to s 69(2)(b) of the Act; (iii) similarly only a High Court judge could grant permission to appeal under s 69(6) of the Act the High Court judge’s decision under s 69(2)(b) of the Act; (iv) notwithstanding the apparent finality of the High Court’s refusal of permission to appeal from the arbitrary award under s 69(2)(b) of the Act, where the High Court had refused permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal, pursuant to s 69(6), the Court of Appeal retained a residual jurisdiction to set aside the refusal of permission under s 69(2)(b) in certain situations of unfair or improper process; (v) those situations were: (a) where the High Court judge had never reached something that could properly be called a decision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll