header-logo header-logo

20 June 2013
Issue: 7565 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

Philip Hanby Ltd v Clarke [2013] EWCA Civ 647, [2013] All ER (D) 107 (Jun)

It was settled law that: (i) the court referred to in s 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996 was the High Court; (ii) accordingly, only the High Court could give or refuse permission to appeal an arbitrary award pursuant to s 69(2)(b) of the Act; (iii) similarly only a High Court judge could grant permission to appeal under s 69(6) of the Act the High Court judge’s decision under s 69(2)(b) of the Act; (iv) notwithstanding the apparent finality of the High Court’s refusal of permission to appeal from the arbitrary award under s 69(2)(b) of the Act, where the High Court had refused permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal, pursuant to s 69(6), the Court of Appeal retained a residual jurisdiction to set aside the refusal of permission under s 69(2)(b) in certain situations of unfair or improper process; (v) those situations were: (a) where the High Court judge had never reached something that could properly be called a decision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll