header-logo header-logo

08 November 2013
Issue: 7583 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

Diag Human SE v Czech Republic [2013] EWHC 3190 (Comm), [2013] All ER (D) 309 (Oct)

Under Art III of the NY Convention, the local court was free to impose its own procedural conditions, such as orders for disclosure, time limits for evidence and, in respect of compliance with those conditions, to make final or unless orders and, in the event of failure to comply with such orders, to impose sanctions including dismissal. That also included security for costs, if otherwise appropriate, and so long as non-discriminatory. The fact that there was an express remedy given by Art VI whereby a defendant might be liable for security in respect of the award and/or for costs did not take away the effect of Art III. There was no reason why, unless disqualified from obtaining security by virtue of the fact that the onus of proof was upon him, a purely passive defendant in award enforcement proceedings should not be able to seek, like any other defendant, security for costs in defending such an application. Consequently, if security for costs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll