header-logo header-logo

12 May 2011
Issue: 7465 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

Lanes Group plc v Galliford Try Infrastructure Ltd [2011] EWHC 1035 (TCC), [2011] All ER (D) 10 (May)

Queen’s Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court, Akenhead J, 19 Apr 2011

The Technology and Construction Court has ruled on the circumstances when a party who institutes a reference to adjudication, but does not want to proceed with the nominated adjudicator, may proceed with another reference for the same dispute.

Karen Gough (instructed by Barton Legal) for the claimant. Piers Stansfield (instructed by McGrigors) for the defendant.

The defendant company was a main contractor engaged to carry out refurbishment works at a train maintenance depot. It engaged the claimant company as a sub-contractor for certain roofing and glazing works. The sub-contract between the parties incorporated the CECA Form of Sub-Contract (July 1998, February 2008 Amendment). Clause 18B(1)(a) gave each party a right to refer any matter in dispute in relation to the sub-contract to adjudication, and provided that the adjudication was to be conducted under The Institution of Civil Engineers Adjudication Procedure (1997) (the AP), which was issued

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll