header-logo header-logo

07 July 2011
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

Excalibur Ventures LLC v Texas Keystone Inc and other companies [2011] EWHC 1624 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 224 (Jun)

The English courts had jurisdiction under the Senior Courts Act 1981 to grant injunctions restraining arbitrations where the seat of the arbitration was in a foreign jurisdiction, although it was a power that was only exercised in exceptional circumstances and with caution. An English court would be particularly slow to restrain arbitration proceedings where there was an agreement for the arbitration to have its seat in a foreign jurisdiction and the parties had unquestionably agreed to the foreign arbitration clause. Questions relating to arbitrability or jurisdiction, or to staying the arbitration, might in appropriate circumstances be left to the foreign courts having supervisory jurisdiction over the arbitration.

Nonetheless, in exceptional cases, the court might exercise its power under s 37 of the 1981 Act to grant such an injunction. Despite the doctrine of “Kompetenz-kompetenz” or “competence-competence” (the ability of an arbitral tribunal to determine its own jurisdiction even where challenged), the English court retained the jurisdiction to determine

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll