header-logo header-logo

Arbitration

07 July 2011
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Excalibur Ventures LLC v Texas Keystone Inc and other companies [2011] EWHC 1624 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 224 (Jun)

The English courts had jurisdiction under the Senior Courts Act 1981 to grant injunctions restraining arbitrations where the seat of the arbitration was in a foreign jurisdiction, although it was a power that was only exercised in exceptional circumstances and with caution. An English court would be particularly slow to restrain arbitration proceedings where there was an agreement for the arbitration to have its seat in a foreign jurisdiction and the parties had unquestionably agreed to the foreign arbitration clause. Questions relating to arbitrability or jurisdiction, or to staying the arbitration, might in appropriate circumstances be left to the foreign courts having supervisory jurisdiction over the arbitration.

Nonetheless, in exceptional cases, the court might exercise its power under s 37 of the 1981 Act to grant such an injunction. Despite the doctrine of “Kompetenz-kompetenz” or “competence-competence” (the ability of an arbitral tribunal to determine its own jurisdiction even where challenged), the English court retained the jurisdiction to determine

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll