header-logo header-logo

Arbitration clauses in consumer contracts

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Janna Purdie considers the fairness of arbitration clauses in consumer contracts

Arbitration agreements and the Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999

The Technology and Construction Court refused to enforce an arbitration award under s 66(3) of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) on the grounds that:
      ●     the arbitrator had not been validly appointed in accordance with AA 1996.
      ●     the arbitration clause did not comply with SI 1999/2083

Facts of the case

The claimant had carried out building work for the defendant and a dispute arose. The claimant's standard terms and conditions provided for any dispute to be referred to arbitration.

The defendant having taken advice, maintained that the standard terms and conditions were contrary to SI 1999/2083 and therefore the arbitration clause did not apply. Therefore, any dispute between the two parties should be dealt with in the courts. The defendant maintained this stance by refusing to participate in the appointment of an arbitrator, disputing the arbitrator's jurisdiction and refusing to take part in the arbitration.

The arbitrator considered that he had jurisdiction

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Chronic delays, duplication of work, cancelled hearings and inefficiencies in the family law courts are letting children and victims of domestic abuse down, a Public Accounts Committee (PAC) inquiry has found
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
back-to-top-scroll