header-logo header-logo

15 March 2018
Issue: 7785 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Arbitration landscape changes following ECJ ruling

Investor-state arbitration clauses in investment treaties between EU Member States are incompatible with EU law, the European Court of Justice has ruled in a landmark judgment.

The decision, in Achmea v Slovak Republic (Case C-284/16), means international organisations must use tribunals in the relevant local country for arbitration rather than choosing one in a preferred location. The case arose from arbitral proceedings that were held in Frankfurt but concerned the 2004 liberalisation of the Slovak health insurance market.

Hogan Lovells partner Markus Burgstaller, who acted for the Slovak Republic, said: ‘As many arbitrations under such treaties are currently pending, the Court's judgment is likely to have far-reaching consequences. Arbitral tribunals will have to analyse very carefully the impact of this landmark decision on cases before them.’

Issue: 7785 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll