header-logo header-logo

Arbitration landscape changes following ECJ ruling

15 March 2018
Issue: 7785 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Investor-state arbitration clauses in investment treaties between EU Member States are incompatible with EU law, the European Court of Justice has ruled in a landmark judgment.

The decision, in Achmea v Slovak Republic (Case C-284/16), means international organisations must use tribunals in the relevant local country for arbitration rather than choosing one in a preferred location. The case arose from arbitral proceedings that were held in Frankfurt but concerned the 2004 liberalisation of the Slovak health insurance market.

Hogan Lovells partner Markus Burgstaller, who acted for the Slovak Republic, said: ‘As many arbitrations under such treaties are currently pending, the Court's judgment is likely to have far-reaching consequences. Arbitral tribunals will have to analyse very carefully the impact of this landmark decision on cases before them.’

Issue: 7785 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll