header-logo header-logo

15 March 2018
Issue: 7785 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Arbitration landscape changes following ECJ ruling

Investor-state arbitration clauses in investment treaties between EU Member States are incompatible with EU law, the European Court of Justice has ruled in a landmark judgment.

The decision, in Achmea v Slovak Republic (Case C-284/16), means international organisations must use tribunals in the relevant local country for arbitration rather than choosing one in a preferred location. The case arose from arbitral proceedings that were held in Frankfurt but concerned the 2004 liberalisation of the Slovak health insurance market.

Hogan Lovells partner Markus Burgstaller, who acted for the Slovak Republic, said: ‘As many arbitrations under such treaties are currently pending, the Court's judgment is likely to have far-reaching consequences. Arbitral tribunals will have to analyse very carefully the impact of this landmark decision on cases before them.’

Issue: 7785 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll