header-logo header-logo

06 October 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Specialist pensions law firm Arc Pensions Law has appointed Ian D’Costa as a legal director in its London office. With more than 15 years’ experience advising on both defined benefit and defined contribution schemes, D’Costa specialises in investment-related pensions work, including liability-driven investments, derivatives, custody, collateral, and risk transfer solutions. He also advises trustees and employers on scheme governance, regulatory compliance, fiduciary duties, and ESG obligations, and has been involved in two successful master trust authorisations.

D’Costa’s career spans leading City and specialist pensions law firms as well as senior in-house roles at major investment managers and pension schemes. His background in complex fund investments, fiduciary management mandates, and large-scale risk transfer transactions provides him with ‘a unique perspective across both pensions and financial services’.

Managing partner Anna Copestake said: ‘We are delighted to welcome Ian to our London office. His expertise across both general pensions advisory work and specialist investment matters further strengthens our team as we continue to grow. Ian is a fantastic addition and will play a key role in supporting our clients.’

D’Costa commented: ‘I am very pleased to be joining Arc Pensions Law. The firm has a fantastic reputation for excellence in pensions law, and I look forward to contributing to the team and advising clients on a wide range of pensions matters.’ His arrival follows the appointment of newly qualified solicitor Salim Al-Sabah to the firm’s Leeds office, underscoring Arc’s continued expansion and commitment to developing the next generation of pensions specialists.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll