header-logo header-logo

01 October 2009 / Peter J Tyldesley
Issue: 7387 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Archaic, unclear & unfair

Part 2: Peter J Tyldesley considers the proposals & prospects for consumer insurance law reform

In December 2009 the English and Scottish Law Commissions will publish a report recommending the reform of consumer insurance law.

The recommendations will be restricted to the pre-contractual provision of information by the consumer—that is non-disclosure or misrepresentation by the consumer and basis of the contract clauses. Appended to the report will be draft legislation, the Consumer Insurance (Disclosure andRepresentations) Bill.

Current law

Part 1 of this article considered the rules on non‑disclosure (see NLJ, 3 July 2009, p 961). Some of the criticisms of those rules apply equally to misrepresentation.

 If an insurer is induced to offer insurance cover by the misrepresentation of a material fact by a consumer it may, on becoming aware of the true position, avoid the policy and refuse to pay any claims.

As with non-disclosure, it is irrelevant whether the consumer acted fraudulently, negligently or entirely innocently. Nor does the insurer need to show a link between the misrepresentation and any

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll