header-logo header-logo

An arctic breeze

31 May 2007 / Richard N M Anderson
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

An impending House of Lords’ case should provide guidance about the way husband and wife businesses may be taxed, says Richard Anderson

The case of Jones v Garnett (Inspector of Taxes) arose as the result of a combination of events. A couple met and married in 1981. She worked in management until 1989 when she left her employment to start a family. He worked in IT as an employee of a number of public companies until about 1989 when he was made redundant. They decided that their best option was to set up their own business and become self-employed. The wife, they decided, would assist for some hours using the management and accounting skills she had learned while working, but would also stay at home looking after the family and the home, supporting her husband in this new venture and leaving him free to devote to it all of his energies.

options

There are several ways in which the couple could have put that decision into effect—the husband could have been a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll