header-logo header-logo

26 August 2016
Issue: 7712 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Are offshore tax sanctions "overkill"?

HMRC has unveiled plans to tackle offshore tax evaders with tough new sanctions.

Those who fail to pay outstanding taxes from offshore investments and accountants would face harsher penalties of up to three times the tax they have tried to evade as well as an increased risk of potential criminal charges. From October, in the run-up to the Common Reporting Standards coming into force in 2017, HMRC will receive more information on people with offshore accounts in the Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories.

Jennie Granger, director general of enforcement and compliance for HMRC, says: “We’ve closed old disclosure facilities, increased penalties, and ramped up our powers to tackle evaders and those that help others evade—the days of any safe havens for tax evaders are numbered.

“Our message is simple—come to us pay the tax and penalties that are due, before we target you with the introduction of even tougher sanctions and game-changing data.”

However, barrister Tom Wesel, partner at international tax consultancy firm Milestone, says: “HMRC already has a very severe penalty regime for offshore evasion, which is further strengthened in the current Finance Bill.

“The new proposals look like overkill. There is no requirement for fault or any intent to evade tax. So entirely innocent errors would be caught. If tax authorities cross the line from taxation by consent to bullying tactics, they risk losing the trust and cooperation that is essential for collecting tax.

“Perhaps HMRC regard those with assets offshore as fair game. But this is a dangerous game for the state to play.”

Issue: 7712 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll