header-logo header-logo

26 August 2016
Issue: 7712 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Are offshore tax sanctions "overkill"?

HMRC has unveiled plans to tackle offshore tax evaders with tough new sanctions.

Those who fail to pay outstanding taxes from offshore investments and accountants would face harsher penalties of up to three times the tax they have tried to evade as well as an increased risk of potential criminal charges. From October, in the run-up to the Common Reporting Standards coming into force in 2017, HMRC will receive more information on people with offshore accounts in the Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories.

Jennie Granger, director general of enforcement and compliance for HMRC, says: “We’ve closed old disclosure facilities, increased penalties, and ramped up our powers to tackle evaders and those that help others evade—the days of any safe havens for tax evaders are numbered.

“Our message is simple—come to us pay the tax and penalties that are due, before we target you with the introduction of even tougher sanctions and game-changing data.”

However, barrister Tom Wesel, partner at international tax consultancy firm Milestone, says: “HMRC already has a very severe penalty regime for offshore evasion, which is further strengthened in the current Finance Bill.

“The new proposals look like overkill. There is no requirement for fault or any intent to evade tax. So entirely innocent errors would be caught. If tax authorities cross the line from taxation by consent to bullying tactics, they risk losing the trust and cooperation that is essential for collecting tax.

“Perhaps HMRC regard those with assets offshore as fair game. But this is a dangerous game for the state to play.”

Issue: 7712 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll