header-logo header-logo

Are we on track with the draft fixed costs rules?

02 June 2023 / Andrew Parker
Issue: 8027 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Personal injury , Damages
printer mail-detail
Andrew Parker reviews the draft rules for extending fixed costs to cases valued up to £100,000
  • The newly published fixed recoverable costs regime applies to all types of case up to £100,000 in value from 1 October 2023, apart from specific exclusions.
  • To drive efficiencies, the new rules have introduced an intermediate track for claims with a value of between £25,000 and £100,000.

In April 2023, the Ministry of Justice and the Civil Procedure Rule Committee published the draft rules for extending fixed recoverable costs from 1 October 2023. Seen as the biggest change to civil justice for a decade, the rules implement the recommendations of Sir Rupert Jackson in his second review of civil litigation costs in 2017 (‘Review of Civil Litigation Costs: Supplemental Report, Fixed Recoverable Costs’, July 2017) and of the Civil Justice Council’s working party on costs in noise-induced hearing loss claims the same year. The draft rules have been published early, so that all those affected have a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll