header-logo header-logo

Are you being e-served?

Service by email across borders: when does the Hague Service Convention apply? Jennifer Brockington-Belli & Lucy Taylor report

  • Explores when proceedings can validly be served by email in cross-border family cases, examining the interaction between the Hague Service Convention, the Family Procedure Rules and Swiss procedural law.
  • Highlights the strategic and enforcement risks of relying on email service overseas, stressing the importance of complying with local legal requirements to ensure judgments can be recognised and enforced internationally.

 


International families increasingly live, work and hold assets across multiple jurisdictions. As a result, family lawyers are now regularly dealing with proceedings in which parties, children and evidence are spread across borders. One issue that continues to create procedural difficulty is how documents should be properly served abroad.

 

The growth of digital communication has inevitably prompted litigants and practitioners to ask whether formal legal service can be effected by email. The question appears straightforward. In practice, however, it raises a complex interaction between domestic procedural rules, international conventions and foreign national

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll