header-logo header-logo

Are you being e-served?

Service by email across borders: when does the Hague Service Convention apply? Jennifer Brockington-Belli & Lucy Taylor report

  • Explores when proceedings can validly be served by email in cross-border family cases, examining the interaction between the Hague Service Convention, the Family Procedure Rules and Swiss procedural law.
  • Highlights the strategic and enforcement risks of relying on email service overseas, stressing the importance of complying with local legal requirements to ensure judgments can be recognised and enforced internationally.

 


International families increasingly live, work and hold assets across multiple jurisdictions. As a result, family lawyers are now regularly dealing with proceedings in which parties, children and evidence are spread across borders. One issue that continues to create procedural difficulty is how documents should be properly served abroad.

 

The growth of digital communication has inevitably prompted litigants and practitioners to ask whether formal legal service can be effected by email. The question appears straightforward. In practice, however, it raises a complex interaction between domestic procedural rules, international conventions and foreign national

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll