header-logo header-logo

Are you being served?

14 November 2019 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Features , Profession , Property
printer mail-detail
Alec Samuels discusses challenging service charges
  • Metropolitan Property Realisations v John Keith Moss: applying principles of common sense to service charge disputes.

High street solicitors who do any property work constantly get queries from clients about service charges for leaseholds, while there is quite a substantial cadre of solicitor and barrister lawyers doing these cases in the Property Tribunal. A landmark decision has been made in Metropolitan Property Realisations v John Keith Moss, CHI/29 UN/LIS/2018/0039, 7 June 2019: it neatly sets out all the normal questions and how the tribunal is approaching them, and forms the basis of this summary.

Limitation of service charges: reasonableness

(1) Relevant costs shall be taken into account in determining the account of a service charge payable for a period:

(a) only to the extent that they are reasonably incurred; and

(b) where they are incurred on the provision of services or the carrying out of works, only if the services or works are of a reasonable standard, and the amount payable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll