header-logo header-logo

14 November 2019 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Features , Profession , Property
printer mail-detail

Are you being served?

Alec Samuels discusses challenging service charges
  • Metropolitan Property Realisations v John Keith Moss: applying principles of common sense to service charge disputes.

High street solicitors who do any property work constantly get queries from clients about service charges for leaseholds, while there is quite a substantial cadre of solicitor and barrister lawyers doing these cases in the Property Tribunal. A landmark decision has been made in Metropolitan Property Realisations v John Keith Moss, CHI/29 UN/LIS/2018/0039, 7 June 2019: it neatly sets out all the normal questions and how the tribunal is approaching them, and forms the basis of this summary.

Limitation of service charges: reasonableness

(1) Relevant costs shall be taken into account in determining the account of a service charge payable for a period:

(a) only to the extent that they are reasonably incurred; and

(b) where they are incurred on the provision of services or the carrying out of works, only if the services or works are of a reasonable standard, and the amount payable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll