header-logo header-logo

18 September 2008 / Muhammad Iqbal , Sulman Hassan
Issue: 7337 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

Armed and ready

Do states have a legal right to protect nationals living abroad? Muhammad Iqbal and Sulman Hassan report

The South Ossetians and Georgians had been in some low level armed conflict with one another for several weeks before Russia’s armed response. However, it was on 8 August, when much of the world’s attention was focussed on the Beijing Olympic Games, that Russian forces responded forcibly to a Georgian attack on rebels in the breakaway province of South Ossetia. Russia said it could not stand aside because many of the people in the breakaway region are its citizens. It had been reported that Russian peacekeepers in the region had suffered 12 dead and 150 wounded, the peacekeeping forces were quoted as saying by Russian news agencies. Georgia accused Russia of meddling in its internal affairs and supporting the separatists, although Russia’s peacekeepers are supposed to be in a neutral role.

Use of arms
Notwithstanding the extraordinary attention attracted by the Russian forcible response a significant issue that has been relatively silent in public media

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll