header-logo header-logo

Artificial intelligence: more personality needed?

06 August 2025
Issue: 8128 / Categories: Legal News , Artificial intelligence , Technology , Legal services
printer mail-detail
The Law Commission, which advises the government on reform, has floated the idea of giving artificial intelligence (AI) systems legal personality

The commissioners stop short of making any specific proposals for reform in their discussion paper, ‘Artificial intelligence and the law’, published last week. However, they note that ‘many of the legal issues raised by AI arise, partly, because AI does not have legal personality’. They conclude by considering ‘a potentially radical option for AI law reform: granting some form of legal personality to AI systems’. The commissioners highlight that, while AI is not yet advanced enough to warrant this option, it may become so ‘in the near future’.

Their paper raises a host of other AI conundrums for discussion: for example, the difficulty of establishing causation and criminal liability, and the impact on public accountability when AI is involved in local authority decision-making.

Chair of the Law Commission, Sir Peter Fraser said: ‘With AI’s potential benefits comes potential harm.’ 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll