header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
07 February 2025 / Emma Kennaugh-Gallacher
Issue: 8103 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology , Artificial intelligence , Copyright , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Artificial intelligence & copyright law: at odds?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
207184
How should copyright laws function in the context of artificial intelligence? Emma Kennaugh-Gallacher highlights the urgent need for clarity in the UK’s approach
  • There is a pressing need for clear regulations around artificial intelligence’s (AI’s) use of copyrighted material, especially regarding training data.

In October last year, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella made his contribution to the ever-growing body of commentary on the conflict between artificial intelligence (AI) technology and intellectual property (IP) infringement. As the defendant in several copyright infringement proceedings worldwide, it probably shouldn’t come as a surprise to learn that Microsoft considers that making use of copyright works for the purposes of training machine learning AI models should not amount to infringement.

Nadella questioned why a machine learning model is any different from someone reading a textbook and using the information they take in to produce new content. While his provocative conclusion, that reading a copyright work and then creating ‘new knowledge’ could be infringement, falls wide of the mark, he is certainly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll