header-logo header-logo

Artificial intelligence & copyright law: at odds?

207184
How should copyright laws function in the context of artificial intelligence? Emma Kennaugh-Gallacher highlights the urgent need for clarity in the UK’s approach
  • There is a pressing need for clear regulations around artificial intelligence’s (AI’s) use of copyrighted material, especially regarding training data.

In October last year, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella made his contribution to the ever-growing body of commentary on the conflict between artificial intelligence (AI) technology and intellectual property (IP) infringement. As the defendant in several copyright infringement proceedings worldwide, it probably shouldn’t come as a surprise to learn that Microsoft considers that making use of copyright works for the purposes of training machine learning AI models should not amount to infringement.

Nadella questioned why a machine learning model is any different from someone reading a textbook and using the information they take in to produce new content. While his provocative conclusion, that reading a copyright work and then creating ‘new knowledge’ could be infringement, falls wide of the mark, he is certainly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll